The activity of propolis against pathogenic fungi isolated from human infections

Abstract Propolis is a resinous hive product collected by bees from the buds or other parts of plants. It is known for having various biological properties, including antifungal activity. Among the substances present in propolis, flavonoids and phenolic acids and their esters are responsible for its antifungal properties. This means that propolis is ideal for use as an antifungal agent in alternative medicine to treat a number of both topical and systemic infections caused by Candida species and other yeast-like fungi, dermatophyte and nondermatophyte moulds, without the serious side effects typical of synthetic treatment. It is also active against strains of fungi that are resistant to polyenes and azoles, the classes of drugs most commonly used to treat fungal infections. In this article, we review current knowledge about the activity of propolis from different parts of the world and its components in vitro and in vivo against pathogenic fungi isolated from human infections. The article also indicates the possible mechanism of antifungal activity of propolis and its components.

Prevalence and determinants of using complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of chronic illnesses: A multicenter study in Bangladesh.

BACKGROUND: While conventional medicine (CM) is commonly used to treat non-communicable diseases (NCDs), complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is gaining popularity as a healthcare option in Bangladesh. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with using CAM solely and using CAM in conjunction with CM for chronic illness treatment among NCD patients in Bangladesh. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted, including 549 adults with a confirmed chronic illness diagnosis from three tertiary care hospitals in Dhaka city. Interviews were used to gather socio-demographic data, while medical records were used to get information on chronic illnesses. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to determine the associated factors of utilizing CAM primarily and CAM use in conjunction with CM to manage the chronic disease. RESULTS: Out of 549 NCD patients (282 women [51.4%], mean [standard deviation] age 45.4 [12.8] years), 180 (32.8%) ever used CAM for the treatment of chronic illness. Also, 15.3% of patients exclusively used CAM among the NCD patients, while 17.5% used CAM in conjunction with CM. Homeopathy medicine was the most prevalent type of treatment among CAM users (52.2%). Furthermore, 55.5% of CAM users said they used it due to its less adverse effects, and 41.6% trusted its effectiveness for chronic illness. Elderly patients (≥60 years) preferred CAM in complementary with CM, but they did not rely only on CAM. According to the multinomial regression analysis, unmarried patients, predominantly in the younger age group, adopted CAM significantly for chronic illness treatment (Relative risk ratio, RRR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.12-0.71, reference = Unmarried). Patients in the high-income group used CAM in conjunction with CM (RRR = 6.26, 95% CI = 1.35-18.90, reference: low-income), whereas patients in the high-income group did not rely on CAM alone (RRR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.34-2.85). CONCLUSION: Although CM remains the mainstream of health care in Bangladesh, CAM services play an essential role in people's health care, particularly in treating chronic illnesses. Physicians of Bangladesh should be aware that their patients may be using other services and be prepared to ask and answer questions regarding the risks and benefits of using CAM in addition to regular medical care. Thus, clinicians required to follow best-practice guidelines, which are currently not practiced in Bangladesh, when disseminating information regarding integrative techniques that combine CM and CAM approaches.

Complementary Therapies Used by Indonesians With Myocardial Infarction.

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted to identify types, frequency, methods, duration, and purpose of complementary therapies used by Indonesians with myocardial infarction. The majority of the respondents used biologically based therapies, with the most common subtype being herbs. The purpose of using biologically based therapies was for health promotion.

Community pharmacists' recommendations for natural products for stress in Melbourne, Australia: a simulated patient study

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are often the first health professional approached to provide treatment for health issues, including the important mental health challenge, stress. Over-the-counter products for stress almost always are complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) and in Australia no protocol exists for their recommendation and sale in community pharmacies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality and relevance of community pharmacists' information gathering (questioning), counselling and product selection when interacting with customers requesting a CAM product for stress and consequently determine whether Australian pharmacy practice indicates the need for guidelines similar to those provided for 'pharmacy only' (S2) and 'pharmacist only' (S3) medicines. METHODS: A covert simulated patient was used to investigate the response of pharmacists to a request for a natural product for stress. The SPs documented the details of the pharmacist-simulated patient interaction immediately on leaving the pharmacy and then re-entered the pharmacy to debrief the pharmacist. The quality of the interaction was scored as a Total CARE (check, assess, respond, explain) Score, based on anticipated questions and counselling advice. The appropriateness of the product was scored as a Product Efficacy Score, based on evidence-based literature. RESULTS: Data from 100 pharmacies was provided. Information gathering illustrated by the questioning components Check and Assess (C and A) of the total CARE score by pharmacists was poor. The number of questions asked ranged from zero (13 pharmacists) to 7 (four pharmacists), the average being 3.1 (SD 1.9). Provision of advice was generally better (a description of the suggested product was offered by 87 pharmacists) but was lacking in other areas (duration of use and side effects were explained by only 41 and 16 pharmacists respectively). The most common product suggested was B-group vitamins (57 pharmacists) followed by a proprietary flower essence product (19 pharmacists). A two-step cluster analysis revealed two sub-groups of pharmacists: one cluster (74 pharmacists) with a high Total CARE score provided an appropriate product. The other cluster (20 pharmacists) had a low total CARE score and provided an inappropriate product. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacy visits revealed major shortcomings in questioning, counselling and product recommendation. There is a need to develop guidelines for pharmacists to make evidence-based decisions in recommending complementary and alternative medicine

No disponible

Ciencia, pseudociencia y la Revista de la AEN / Science, pseudoscience and the AEN Journal

No disponible

A qualitative analysis of the naming process of complementary and alternative medicine by chronically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: A chronic illness/condition typically generates some disturbance in people. In the context of this turmoil, some individuals might make a choice to use healing options outside of regular allopathic medicine. This study is an attempt to understand the processes through which health practices/healing options get named as Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) by chronic illness patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study used a grounded theory methodology to collect and analyze data. Following the principles of theoretical sampling, in-depth face to face interviews were conducted with a total of 21 individuals with varied chronic illnesses/conditions residing in Miami. The study sample constituted of 16 women and 5 men, belonging to different ethnicities and using varied health practices and healing options. FINDINGS: Through the findings it is suggested, that there is nothing definite about the definition of CAM. Individuals name and rename activities and health practices as CAM based on their perceptions and the way they approach such health practices/healing options. The naming process of CAM is contextual and even food and activities or pastimes can get named as CAM if they hold meaning for a person. CONCLUSION: Research in the US continually shows that CAM is widely used, but what actually constitutes CAM differs based on whom you ask. Whether what can be named as CAM should be circumscribed or left open is a debate that has policy implications and needs to be explored by future researchers.

The schism in chiropractic through the eyes of a 1st year chiropractic student.

Since its inception, the chiropractic profession has been divided along ideological fault lines. These divisions have led to a profession wide schism, which has limited mainstream acceptance, utilisation, social authority and integration. The authors explore the historical origins of this schism, taking time to consider historical context, religiosity, perpetuating factors, logical fallacies and siege mentality. Evidence is then provided for a way forward, based on the positioning of chiropractors as mainstream partners in health care.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Breast Cancer.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been in use among cancer patients for a long time. There are several types of CAM that are practiced in various parts of the world. For example, traditional medicinal practices followed in India and China are frequently used by cancer patients. CAM is broadly classified into five different categories: (1) traditional medicines, (2) mind-body interventions, (3) biology-based practices, (4) manipulative body-based practices, and (5) energy medicine. In this review, we have compiled data from the available literature regarding CAM use in breast cancer patients. We have highlighted the current concepts and the need for more structured studies to facilitate the implementation of CAM as a mainstream option for cancer patients.

[How to Classify and Evaluate Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Oncology]. / Komplementäre und alternative Methoden bei Krebs einordnen und bewerten.

There are a vast number of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in oncology. Also patients' needs for information on these methods are growing. Helping patients to classify and evaluate CAM methods is a challenge. The Cancer Information Service at the German Cancer Research Center has developed a benefit-risk-assessment based on evidence-based medicine and individual patient traits: To rate a CAM's benefit, the scientific evidence and the patient's therapeutic goals have to be taken into account. To estimate its risks, both, the method itself and the patient's status of health must be considered.

A review of complementary therapies for chemotherapy induced gastrointestinal mucositis.

Administration of chemotherapy often leads to gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM). GIM manifests as nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhoea in recipients of chemotherapy. GIM is a major complication occurring in approximately 80% of patients receiving 5-flurouracil treatment. These side-effects may become so severe that significant dose reductions are required, ultimately affecting treatment efficacy and patient survival. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a growing area of public interest. This review will provide an overview of current knowledge of complementary medicinal therapies for chemotherapy induced GIM. An understanding of this evolving literature is useful in discussing these therapies with patients who are considering using them.

Use and users of complementary and alternative medicine among people with multiple sclerosis in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: It is known that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is popular among people with multiple Sclerosis (MS) and that use is widespread. However, very limited knowledge exists about use and users of CAM among people with MS in a Danish context. AIMS: The overall aim of the thesis is to investigate how and why people with MS in Denmark include CAM in managing their life with a chronic disease and to discuss their experiences and beliefs linked to CAM use.   METHODS: A mixed methods research design was applied, combining an Internet-based survey with two qualitative in-depth interview studies. A total of 6,850 people with MS from the five Nordic countries, of these 3,500 from Denmark, were invited to participate in the survey. The average response rate was 56.1%. Based on analyses of the Danish survey data, two specific issues regarding the use of CAM were selected for further investigation and two qualitative interview studies were performed (n = 17, n = 11), using program theory and meaning categorization as analytical tools. RESULTS: The results of the study indicate that the use of CAM among people with MS is widespread in Denmark as well as in the other Nordic countries. The results furthermore suggest that this use is generally embedded in a preventative, autonomous approach to treatment and that the users' choices regarding CAM may be related to many personal factors and do not necessarily represent a distrust of the medical system. PERSPECTIVES: The results of the study point to the relevance of healthcare professionals engaging in understanding patients' different motives for - and experiences with - using different types of treatments. Thereby, the results of the study also point to the importance of enhancing and qualifying communication between patients and representatives of conventional healthcare systems regarding the patients' use of CAM, both with the aim of mutual learning and for reasons of safety.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, types of CAM used, and reasons for CAM use among reproductive-age women in the United States. METHODS: Data are from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey. We examined a nationally representative sample of U.S. women ages 18 to 44 (n = 5,764 respondents). Primary outcomes were past year CAM use, reasons for CAM use, and conditions treated with CAM by pregnancy status (currently pregnant, gave birth in past year, neither). Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of CAM use by pregnancy status. FINDINGS: Overall, 67% of reproductive-age U.S. women reported using any CAM in the past year. Excluding vitamins, 42% reported using CAM. Significant differences in use of biologically based (p = .03) and mind-body therapies (p = .012) by pregnancy status were found. Back pain (17.1%), neck pain (7.7%), and anxiety (3.7%) were the most commonly reported conditions treated with CAM among reproductive-age women. However, 20% of pregnant and postpartum women used CAM for pregnancy-related reasons, making pregnancy the most common reason for CAM use among pregnant and postpartum women. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use during the childbearing year is prevalent, with one-fifth of currently or recently pregnant women reporting CAM use for pregnancy-related reasons. Policymakers should consider how public resources may be used to support appropriate, effective use of alternative approaches to managing health during pregnancy and postpartum. Providers should be aware of the changing needs and personal health practices of reproductive age women.

Estudo etnofarmacológico em entorno de floresta urbana como subsídio para a implantação da Fitoterapia no Sistema Único de Saúde / Ethnopharmacological study surrounding urban forest as a resource for the implementation of herbal medicine in the National Health System

RESUMO O estudo etnofarmacológico pode ser definido como exploração científica interdisciplinar dos agentes biologicamente ativos, tradicionalmente utilizados por populações humanas e que fazem parte de um acervo de conhecimento compartilhado. Desta forma o presente estudo teve como objetivo o estudo etnofarmacológico de plantas medicinais, no entorno de floresta urbana na Reserva Biológica Poço D’Anta em Juiz de Fora/MG visando a implantação da fitoterapia no Sistema Único de Saúde. Para este, realizou-se levantamento com três diferentes amostras: profissionais de saúde, domicílios em geral e especialistas locais. Quanto aos profissionais de saúde, pôde-se constatar que nenhum entrevistado soube conceituar o termo “Fitoterápico” e que não conheciam as políticas vigentes. Constatou-se que há aceitabilidade da implantação de Fitoterapia na saúde pública, porém, o conhecimento do tema é limitado. A partir das entrevistas nos domicílios em geral e com os especialistas locais, selecionou-se um total de 20 espécies botânicas para análise estatística e confirmação farmacológica. Esses resultados possibilitaram confrontar o conhecimento cultural com científico, com base em 14 espécies que poderiam ser cultivadas em horto na Reserva Biologica Poço D´Anta, com base em suas relevâncias locais. Os resultados obtidos podem subsidiar a aproximação do saber popular em relação ao científico, servindo de base para manutenção e fomento da implantação da Fitoterapia no sistema único de saúde.

ABSTRACT The ethnopharmacological study can be defined as an interdisciplinary scientific exploration of biologically active agents, traditionally used by human populations and part of a shared body of knowledge. Thus, the current study focused on the ethnopharmacological research of medicinal plants, in the surroundings of the urban forest in the Biological Reserve PoçoD’Anta in Juiz de Fora / MG, aiming on the implementation of the herbal medicine in the Public Health System. For this purpose, a survey was held with three different groups: health professionals, members of the community and local experts.Concerning the health professionals, it could be verified that none of the participants were able to explain the term Phytotherapic and neither they had knowledge about the relevant and applicable policies.The acceptability for the implantation of Phytotherapy for public health use was observed, but the knowledge about this subject is limited. From the interviews with members of the community and local experts, a total of 20 plant species were selected for a statistical analysis and pharmacological confirmation. These results made possible to compare the cultural knowledge with the scientific one, defining 14 species that could be grown in the garden of the Biological Reserve Poço D’Anta, based on their local relevance. The results can support the approximation of the popular knowledge with the scientific one, providing a basis for the maintenance and promotion of the Phytotherapy in the Public Health System.

Integrative oncology: an overview.

Integrative oncology, the diagnosis-specific field of integrative medicine, addresses symptom control with nonpharmacologic therapies. Known commonly as "complementary therapies" these are evidence-based adjuncts to mainstream care that effectively control physical and emotional symptoms, enhance physical and emotional strength, and provide patients with skills enabling them to help themselves throughout and following mainstream cancer treatment. Integrative or complementary therapies are rational and noninvasive. They have been subjected to study to determine their value, to document the problems they ameliorate, and to define the circumstances under which such therapies are beneficial. Conversely, "alternative" therapies typically are promoted literally as such; as actual antitumor treatments. They lack biologic plausibility and scientific evidence of safety and efficacy. Many are outright fraudulent. Conflating these two very different categories by use of the convenient acronym "CAM," for "complementary and alternative therapies," confuses the issue and does a substantial disservice to patients and medical professionals. Complementary and integrative modalities have demonstrated safety value and benefits. If the same were true for "alternatives," they would not be "alternatives." Rather, they would become part of mainstream cancer care. This manuscript explores the medical and sociocultural context of interest in integrative oncology as well as in "alternative" therapies, reviews commonly-asked patient questions, summarizes research results in both categories, and offers recommendations to help guide patients and family members through what is often a difficult maze. Combining complementary therapies with mainstream oncology care to address patients' physical, psychologic and spiritual needs constitutes the practice of integrative oncology. By recommending nonpharmacologic modalities that reduce symptom burden and improve quality of life, physicians also enable patients to play a role in their care. Critical for most patients, this also improves the physician-patient relationship, the quality of cancer care, and the well-being of patients and their families.

Regional variation in use of complementary health approaches by U.S. adults.

KEY FINDINGS: Data from the National Health Interview Survey, 2012 Use of nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements (17.9%) was greater than any other complementary health approach used by U.S. adults in 2012. The use of practitioner-based chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation was nearly twice as high in the West North Central region as in the United States overall. Use of nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements was highest in the Mountain, Pacific, and West North Central regions. Use of yoga with deep breathing or meditation was approximately 40% higher in the Pacific and Mountain regions than in the United States overall. Complementary health approaches are defined as "a group of diverse medical and health care interventions, practices, products, or disciplines that are not generally considered part of conventional medicine". They range from practitioner-based approaches, such as chiropractic manipulation and massage therapy, to predominantly self-care approaches, such as nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements, meditation, and yoga. This report presents estimates of the four most commonly used complementary health approaches among adults aged 18 and over in nine geographic regions, using data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey adult alternative medicine supplement.

Types and sociodemographic correlates of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among people with epilepsy in Oman.

Nonpharmacological treatment strategies that originate from sociocultural teachings and are beyond the scope of allopathic medicine are commonly used among people with epilepsy (PWE) in many parts of the world. The present study explored the types and sociodemographic correlates of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among PWE in Oman among attendees of a neurological unit at a tertiary care center. Data on the types of CAM were gathered from telephone interviews. The relevant demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants were obtained from electronic medical records. Of the total of 101 participants, 73.3% were CAM users. The majority of these participants have not disclosed their CAM use to their allopathic health-care providers. The most common types of CAM reported were those falling under the 'mind-body' type (incantations and fumigation) and biologically based (herbal concoctions) or a combination of them. Compared to non-CAM users, a significant and greater proportion of CAM users attributed the etiology of their illness to nonbiomedical factors such as 'evil eyes' (P=0.04). The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that the use of CAM was highly associated with age of <30years (OR=3.09; 95% CI: 1.10, 5.46), unemployment (OR=2.04; 95% CI: 1.15, 6.39), having basic school education (OR=2.21; 95% CI: 0.83, 5.18), low family income (OR=1.52; 95% CI: 0.91, 2.11), and the presence of hypersalivation (OR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.01, 4.39). Further studies are needed to harmonize these two healing practices. On the whole, this study indicates that among attendees of tertiary care utilization, CAM is common among PWE in Oman. The most utilized type of CAM falls under the umbrella of mind-body practice.

[Integrative and complementary health practices: the supply and production of care in the Unified National Health System and in selected municipalities in Brazil]. / Práticas integrativas e complementares: oferta e produção de atendimentos no SUS e em municípios selecionados.

The world of Traditional/Complementary and Alternative Medicine has grown and its importance has been emphasized in several studies. In Brazil, the National Policy on Integrative and Complementary Practices encourages their inclusion and empowerment in primary care. This study attempted to identify the provision of services and integrative practices in the Unified National Health System and the production of consultations from 2000 to 2011, contrasting the analysis of available information in national databases with the primary care data collected locally in Campinas (São Paulo State), Florianópolis (Santa Catarina State), and Recife (Pernambuco State). Analysis of the data revealed a mismatch between records in information systems and actual practices in these cities. This mismatch is due largely to lack of definition on the scope of what are understood as integrative and complementary practices in the Brazilian National Policy, thereby posing a major limitation to their measurement and evaluation, since current information does not allow adequate recording of such practices.